![]() We've had difficulty training our users to wait for the path to be established before trying to talk. DPL takes too long to decode-a significant fraction of a second. The next time we do a big reconfiguration of our system requiring radios to be reprogrammed, we are going back to TPL. We use DPL on all signals, including both the input and output of the repeater. We have a UHF system of approximately 150 radios, working both through a repeater and direct. In addition, each code can be used either "normal" or "inverted." is considered to be more difficult to scan for DPL codes than TPL, although with some of the newer available receivers, this isn't necessarily still true. The biggest advantage of DPL over TPL is that there are more different choices of codes with DPL. I will give you one short answer based on my experience. ![]() ![]() There are a large number of factors to consider when selecting DPL vs.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |